Publication at Faculty of Social Sciences |
2011
Abstract
The article deals with the theoretical and methodological underpinnings of best practice research (BPR). First, the basic components of BPR are formulated and analyzed.
Then two different approaches to BPR are reviewed and discussed their pros and cons. Then the general problems of BPR are considered as well as possible ways of their getting over.
The article shows that currently there is nothing like "best practice of best practice research" and it is argued that much has to be done in the development of BPR theory and methodology. The article concludes with several recommendations for improvement (mixed research design, clear definition of purpose, focus upon mechanisms etc.)