The existence of the Czech Army is at stake. We need to get over present cuts in military budget, ill-advised savings, without searching for new appropriate financial and material sources.
To save something important means always to sacrifice or to give up something. Some security and military experts wish to dissociate themselves with approved methods.
They think that the White Paper doesn't express opinions on many important things. It is assumed that after five years there will be need to revise this White Paper.
So, the author proposes, wouldn't be better for us to regard the White Paper only as an analytical document containing certain proposals for the following Defence Strategy of the CR, as originally intended?