"Zdeněk Kratochvíl: Délský potápěč k Hérakleitově řeči. Pro ty, kdo se potápějí až do krajnosti. Praha, Herrmann a synové, 2006, ISBN 80-87054-00-8."
2008
Abstract
A review asks two questions: 1. What are the methodological assumptions and 2.
What are the conflicts which lead the author? Ad 1. Author respects the non-linearity of the text which he interpreted.
The Herakleitos is in the role of inspirator, he isn´t a "interpreted object". Author shows the speech of Herakleitos speech (the importance of literature structures).
Ad2. A connection to the physis, traditional metaphysic, construction of reality as the total structure of cognition, religion as the opportinuty to risk, theodicea, overvestimating of intellect as the most valuable attribute of human being, education, Aristotles philosophy.