Abstrakt
The article interprets Plutarch's dualism in the light of the ApolloDionysus opposition as presented in 'De E' 388e-389c, arguing that Plutarch is no dualist in the strict sense of the word. A comparison of 'De E' 393f-394a with 'De Iside'.
The article interprets Plutarch's dualism in the light of the ApolloDionysus opposition as presented in 'De E' 388e-389c, arguing that Plutarch is no dualist in the strict sense of the word. A comparison of 'De E' 393f-394a with 'De Iside'.