Abstract
The Article focuses on recent issue, from the point of view of the state administration as well as self-government that keeps on requiring other interpretations and opinions despite the existence of legal regulation in force and case law in this area. With regard to the relevance of the issue reflected also by the government who decided on legislative task to submit amendment of the Free Access to Information Act, the author focuses on the drafting process of the bill which has been submitted yet.
He monitors the development of the said bill since its ""prehistory"", i. e. year 2006 when the government adopted this task for the first time till the present when the bill arranged according to sections is being discussed in the legislative process at the governmental level. The author systematically surveys the legislative process as well as the subject-matter of the bill which was preparing for a long time also due to suspension of the drafting process.
He uses functionally all available materials, i. e. analytical studies, legislative considerations and, finally, concrete proposals. He also deals with the development of the case law and following changes of the legislative intent to submit amendment of the Free Access to Information Act to legislative debate.