Efficiency of acidemia correction on intermittent versus continuous hemodialysis in acute methanol poisoning
Abstrakt
Context: Acidemia is a marker of prognosis in methanol poisoning, as well as compounding formate-induced cytotoxicity. Prompt correction of acidemia is a key treatment of methanol toxicity and methods to optimize this are poorly defined.
Objective: We studied the efficiency of acidemia correction by intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in a mass outbreak of methanol poisoning. Methods: The study was designed as observational cohort study.
The mean time for an increase of 1 mmol/L HCO3-, 0.01 unit arterial blood pH, and the total time for correction of HCO3- were determined in IHD- and CRRT-treated patients. Results: Data were obtained from 18 patients treated with IHD and 13 patients treated with CRRT.
At baseline, CRRT group was more acidemic than IHD group (mean arterial pH 6.79 +- 0.10 versus 7.05 +- 0.10; p = 0.001). No association was found between the rate of acidemia correction and age, weight, serum methanol, lactate, formate, and glucose on admission.
The time to HCO3- correction correlated with arterial blood pH (r= -0.511; p = 0.003) and creatinine (r = 0.415; p = 0.020). There was association between the time to HCO3- correction and dialysate/effluent and blood flow rates (r= -0.738; p < 0.001 and r= -0.602; p < 0.001, correspondingly).
The mean time for HCO3- to increase by 1 mmol/L was 12 +- 2 min for IHD versus 34 +- 8 min for CRRT (p < 0.001), and the mean time for arterial blood pH to increase 0.01 was 7 +- 1 mins for IHD versus 11 +- 4 min for CRRT (p = 0.024). The mean increase in HCO3- was 5.67 +- 0.90 mmol/L/h for IHD versus 2.17 +- 0.74 mmol/L/h for CRRT (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Our study supports the superiority of IHD over CRRT in terms of the rate of acidemia correction.