Abstract
The leitmotiv of the Civil Litigation Procedure Code is the maxim justice delayed, justice denied. However, the courts by applying the law sometimes unreasonably favor the principle of the speediness of the proceeding at the expense of the value of justice.
The reasons seem to be a far too free regulation of the Civil Litigation Procedure Code and also a formalistic approach of some courts. The authors of this paper see the solution of this problem, demonstrated on the institutes of the judgment in default and the judicial concentration of proceeding, in replacing the maxim of justice delayed, justice denied with a maxim justice too delayed, justice denied.