Abstract
The paper builds on the 3A methodology to evaluate learning activities. In this text, activities of one group at a science camp are analysed with a special focus on inquiry-based aspects of the participants' scope of employment.
The authors observed several factors which reduce effectiveness of such activities. Above all, it is students' initial rash setting to work without considering the problem fully.
They also immerse in work starting with technical procedures, get tired and do not accomplish the actual goal. The authors offer some alterations and conclude that this is mostly caused by an absenting driving question.