The presented paper describes for more than 25-year-lasting shortcomings of the current Czech legal regulations on employer's liability in case of injury caused to employee as aresult of occupational accident or occupational disease. The above-mentioned shortcomings arise from acombination of employer's liability for damage caused to an employee by an occupational accident or occupational disease and statutory employer's insurance specified for thiscase.
In the context of the subject in question, we analyse the wrong practice of the lower courts, which, however, leads (at least in part) to correcting the inappropriate and ineffective legislation. Specifically, there are cases of transfer of rights and obligations from em-ployment relationships with auniversal legal successor where the courts in civil proceedings for compensation for damage caused to former employees in respect to occupational accident or occupational disease by amerged employer decide that in the proceedings the court will continue with the Czech Insurance Company or the Kooperativa Insurance Company, Vienna Insurance Group, where the merged employer is insured, instead of with the universal legal successor of the merged defendant company (employer).