Abstract
obsolete methods, inappropriately standardized, and if there is a standard, does not meet the psychometric standard of diagnostic methods. It is therefore necessary to statistically and psychometrically verify these methods, which provided the basis for psycholinguistic research in the 1990s.
The subject of the presented study is the analysis of the tachistoscope tool RAM 3.5, C. Pavur (1999) and its psychometric and statistical testing as a suitable method for the diagnosis of association joints and a performance diagnostic tool for language memory.
Thanks to IRT analysis, which, unlike classical test theory (CTT), we do not have to assume a normal distribution of test scores, and thus statistical estimates of partial aspects may not depend on a significant sample (n = 500). This method of ad hoc testing, based on detailed statistical and psychometric analysis, can help to improve the quality of psychodiagnostic tools