Requesting that a child seek compensation for damage for a "child's debt" from parents who breached the duty of due managerial care in administration of the child's assets and liabilities (see part one and two of the study) appears to be problematic from the practical and above all ethical point of view. This is all the more so because the root cause of the problem (the child becomes aware of the debt as an adult) is not in the Civil Code, but in the lack of effective protection of the rights of minors in the civil proceedings.
This is the principal direction in which the considerations of possible changes to current legislation should be focused.