Why it doesn't work - (ethical) starting points and conceptualization of positive measures as a source (limitation) of their legitimacy and effectiveness in practice
Abstract
Why are positive measures (affirmative actions) in favour of less represented and long-term or structurally disadvantaged groups/minorities associated with such prejudices and even condemnations - with which they themselves, albeit in a different sense, but nevertheless, have to fight? Why are they questioned and cause many unconstructive discussions, even though they have demonstrable benefits in the practical promotion of equality? With this text, I aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of this conflict by approaching selected perspectives of their justification. I proceed from the assumption that the unilateral anchoring of these programs or measures in certain (primarily ethical) approaches arouses some a priori tensions even before such programs are concretely designed or implemented.
This "preliminary distrust" then psychologically reduces their benefits in practice.