Particular Aspects of Public Sociology: Potential Perspectives of Dialogue in The Republic of Sociologists
Abstract
This article explores the concept of public sociology, its origins, theoretical foundations, and its intersections with Czech social thought. The suppression of sociology as a whole during the communist regime is discussed as a backdrop to the emergence of public sociology.
The foundational definition of public sociology by Michael Burawoy is introduced, along with his key work "For Public Sociology" (Burawoy 2005a), which sparked discussions and established a prominent direction in sociological thinking. Burawoy's division of sociological labour and his eleven theses are highlighted, focusing on the first three theses.
The development and reception of public sociology are discussed, including its expansion into fields like ethnography, international relations, and philosophy. The significance of comparing public sociology in different national contexts is noted.
Various figures of Czech social thought, including Rádl, Mertl, and Fajfr but also F. Peroutka, are presented as potential contributors to public sociology.
The tension between traditional and organic public sociology, as well as its connections to political and philosophical ideas, are analyzed. The relevance of public sociology in bridging the gap between academia and society is underlined.
The interplay between professionalism, neutrality, and engagement in sociological work is examined, reflecting Burawoy's arguments. Overall, the article provides insights into the theoretical underpinnings of public sociology, its historical context, and its potential contributions to contemporary sociological discourse.