Abstrakt
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of joint replacement infection is a difficult clinical challenge that often occurs when the implant cannot be salvaged. We hypothesize that the pH value of synovial fluid could be an important indicator of the inflammatory status of the joint.
However, in the literature, there is a lack of data on the pH changes in hip and knee joint replacements and their relation to infection and implant failure. In this study, we aimed to measure the pH levels of synovial fluid in patients with hip and knee joint replacements.
We also investigated the potential of pH measurement as a diagnostic tool for joint replacement infection. In this study, we recorded the pH values to be 7.55 and 7.46 in patients where Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified as the cause of the prosthetic joint infection.
We attribute this to the different environments created by this specific bacterium. In other cases where the pH was higher, chronic mitigated infections were diagnosed, caused by strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiase, and coagulase negative staphylococcus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our cohort of 155 patients with implanted hip (THA; n = 85) or knee (TKA; n = 70) joint replacements, we conducted a prospective study with a pH measurement. Out of the whole cohort, 44 patients had confirmed joint replacement infection (28.4%) (44/155).
In 111 patients, infection was ruled out (71.6%) (111/155). Joint replacement infection was classified according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) from 2018.
Based on the measured values, we determined the cut-off level for the probability of ongoing inflammation. We also determined the sensitivity and specificity of the measurement.
RESULTS: The group of patients with infection (n = 44) had a significantly lower synovial fluid pH (pH = 6.98 +- 0.48) than the group of patients with no infection (n = 111, pH = 7.82 +- 0.29, p < 0.001). The corresponding median pH values were 7.08 for the patients with infection and 7.83 for the patients with no infection.
When we determined the cut-off level of pH 7.4, the sensitivity level of infected replacements was 88.6%, and the specificity level of the measurement was 95.5%. The predictive value of a positive test was 88.6%, and the predictive value of a negative test was 95.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that it is appropriate to include a pH measurement in the diagnostic spectrum of hip and knee replacements. This diagnostic approach has the potential to provide continuous in vivo feedback, facilitated by specialized biosensors.
The advantage of this method is the future incorporation of a pH-detecting sensor into intelligent knee and hip replacements that will assess pH levels over time. By integrating these biosensors into intelligent implants, the early detection of joint replacement infections could be achieved, enhancing proactive intervention strategies.